why? in the last ten years, larger studios that passed on films like, 'the hurt locker' and 'slumdog millionaire' insist on releasing inspirational trash that is easily palatable for a moronic american audience. a good example comes to us this year in the form of, 'the blind side'. now sandra bullock won the oscar for best actress for this film that critics are slamming and audiences are loving. i think this is because audiences can't seem to permeate the thick crunchy outer layer of the true underdog story and reach the gooey racially prejudice centre. this is a movie that as far as plot goes, is the movie 'beethoven'! except that the cute and fuzzy st. bernard dog that stuggles to understand our ways is a big black dude! why aren't audiences angry? is sandra's charisma really THAT powerful? it seems so.
anyway back to the vid below. first this is not a trailer for an actual movie. this was made to make a point. movies that we watch are becoming so one dimensional and formulaic that studios don't feel the need to challenge their audiences. this is not a good thing. and until they realise this, the best picture prize will continue to go to smaller complex films. the below video outlines the step-by-step recipe that studios are choosing to follow when they make movies this time of year. enjoy!
2 comments:
haha i love!
whilst procrastinating on studying for a test, i found yer blog on a search for 'darth douchebag.' because i'm bored.
i loved the blind side. i absolutely did not interpret it in the extremely negative and racially charged manner in which you did, and i'm sorry you weren't able to enjoy it. i came away feeling like i'd just watched a very hopeful, very touching movie about a woman who adopted a sweet, caring young man who'd never been given the chance to excel at anything ever before.
i rather doubt the pro-football player the movie is based on considers himself victimized by his white parents. but that's just one person's opinion.
Post a Comment